Category ""
ADVERTISING
I noticed some caching issues with service calls when repeating the same service call (long polling). Adding metadata didn't help.
Alright, this is due to the pain that godaddy gives me by implementing their own caching in a MANAGED WORDPRESS hosting.
If someone is calling docker build isn't it assumed that they want to rebuild without the cache? In what use case would someone want to build an image and use a previously built image? I just lost a day because an earlier build failed silently yet completed "successful" and I was using the broken image not understanding why updates to the build script wasnt working
nocache. Don't waste your time reinventing the wheel, use the nocache middleware instead. It has been here for 9 years (2024) and it is downloaded more than 2 million times per week. Having only 140 stars on github, this is actually one of those unsung heroes of the express ecosystem. Install it npm install --save nocache Add it to you app:
I don't find get the practical difference between Cache-Control:no-store and Cache-Control:no-cache. As far as I know, no-store means that no cache device is allowed to cache that response. In the...
Introduction. The correct minimum set of headers that works across all mentioned clients (and proxies): Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate Pragma: no-cache Expires: 0
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(System.Web.HttpCacheability.NoCache); Response.Cache.SetNoStore(); And also a meta tag method (it won't work for me, since some MVC actions send partial HTML/JSON through Ajax, without a head, meta tag).
Great explanation, and so typical for us devs to forget about the ancient compatibility reasons of old... in our SlickStack (LEMP) project, for dynamic content e.g. WordPress pages, we set nocache but enable server-side Nginx FastCGI caching, and for static files we set public, max-age=691200 which might also be overwritten by CDNs like Cloudflare.
Under certain circumstances, IE6 will still cache files even when Cache-Control: no-cache is in the response headers.
When sent by the origin server. I believe max-age=0 simply tells caches (and user agents) the response is stale from the get-go and so they SHOULD revalidate the response (eg. with the If-Not-Modified header) before using a cached copy, whereas, no-cache tells them they MUST revalidate before using a cached copy.